Everyone's favorite scoundrel goes Solo! Han is given a top-secret undercover mission for the Rebellion: rescuing several informants and spies! His cover for the assignment? Only the biggest and most infamous starship race in the galaxy, the Dragon Void! A tournament he has dreamt of winning his entire life. With a chance of glory, can Han keep his mind on the mission? Or is fa...(展开全部)

瞿同祖（1910－2008）归侨历史学家。长沙人。1936年毕业于燕京大学，获硕士学位。曾任云南大学历史系教授。1945年赴美国，任美国哥伦比亚大学、哈佛大学研究员。后去加拿大，任不列颠哥伦比亚大学教授。1965年回国，历任湖南省文史研究馆馆员、政协湖南省文史资料研究委员会副主任，中国社会科学院近代史研究所研究员。1980年出席第二十七届欧洲汉学会议。1985年，以高级学者名义访问美国哈佛大学、芝加哥大学、华盛顿大学，阐述儒家思想与中国法律发展的关系。著有《中国封建社会》、《清代地方政府》、《汉代社会》、《中国法律与中国社会》等。

“作家访谈”是美国文学杂志《巴黎评论》（Paris Review）最持久、最著名的特色栏目。自一九五三年创刊号中的E.M.福斯特访谈至今，《巴黎评论》一期不落地刊登当代最伟大作家的长篇访谈，最初冠以“小说的艺术”之名，逐渐扩展到“诗歌的艺术”“批评的艺术”等，迄今已达三百篇以上，囊括了二十世纪下半叶至今世界文坛几乎所有的重要作家。作家访谈已然成为《巴黎评论》的招牌，同时树立了“访谈”这一特殊文体的典范。 一次访谈从准备到实际进行，往往历时数月甚至跨年，且并非为配合作家某本新书的出版而作，因此毫无商业宣传的气息。作家们自然而然地谈论各自的写作习惯、方法、困惑的时刻、文坛秘辛……内容妙趣横生，具有重要的文献价值，加之围绕访谈所发生的一些趣事，令这一栏目本身即成为传奇，足可谓“世界历史上持续时间最长的文化对话行为之一”。

本辑收录“E.M.福斯特、弗朗索瓦丝.萨冈、奥尔德斯.赫胥黎、哈罗德.品特 、豪尔赫.路易斯.博尔赫斯、艾萨克.巴什维斯.辛格、E.B.怀特、巴勃罗.聂鲁达、约翰.斯坦贝克、库尔特.冯内古特、胡里奥.科塔萨尔、唐.德里罗、苏珊.桑塔格、伊恩.麦克尤恩、诺曼.梅勒、大江健三郎。

The documents collected here derive from the day-to-day work of governing the Han empire (202 BCE to 221 CE) and illustrate the process involved in the major administrative tasks such as the implementation of the laws, the collection of tax, and the maintenance of security. As parts of an archive they supplement the standard histories of the Han period which concentrate on dyn...(展开全部)

AA Book: Projects Collection & Portfolio 2009 is presented this year in a thicker, heftier print form than ever before. In its 496 full-colour pages you will find a complete record of the AA’s 2008/09 academic year, including commissioned texts, photo-journalism, reviews, graphics, photographs and, most importantly, projects selected from across the entire School. 《英国建筑联盟学院作品集2...(展开全部)

Peer review is supposed to ensure that published work, in philosophy and in other disciplines, meets high standards of rigor and interest. But many people fear that it no longer is fit to play this role. This Element examines some of their concerns. It uses evidence that critics of peer review sometimes cite to show its failures, as well as empirical literature on the reception...(展开全部)